Does the camera really suck that much or is it me?
I mean it doesn't focus its ALWAYS so corny, even outside on a sunny day.
Its worse than early phone cameras.
And I do have it on best quality and biggest image, I also tried reducing it and stuff, and I have no filter on.
It can't really be that bad, can it?
No it's not just you
a very poor camera, giving similar results as obtained on cheap feature phones. On top of this the location of the lens means it's almost always shooting through a smudge of fingerprint, pocket lint etc.
The images posted by racky actually illustrate the point rather than refute it: the A43 camera is OK as a visual notetaker but if you object to flare, colour casts, low resolution, low sharpness and poor saturation then use something else. You only need to spend ┬ú25 to get a new 5 megapixel camera with zoom, antishake, autofocus etc. that will completely outperform the camera on the A43. The only advantage it has over bargain basement cams is that it can shoot 720p video.
Remember though that the A43 is not a phone with an artificially low price subsidised by a network. You shouldn't expect the same quality of camera in ┬ú120 tablet as is found in a phone (unsubsidised) or in a tablet which costs between ┬ú300 and ┬ú600.